Now the squares that have no video and could have been easily put away elsewhere are now big as ever and colorful!

Fuck full screen of presentations! You need to see people’s names on big ass squares covering the entire screen! That’s where the money is! There is always a banana stand! (Don’t know the context)

  • Kushan@lemmy.worldEnglish
    3·
    1 month ago

    This actually is an improvement. Not everyone wants to be on camera and for those folks, getting pushed off to the sidebar often means they’re overlooked.

    This at least means they’re given the same importance as anyone else.

    No idea what the rant about presentations is about, when anyone presents it becomes the main content and everyone - camera or not - gets pushed to the sidebar. You can also pop out presentation content to give it it’s own dedicated window.

    I hate teams as a communication platform, but the presentation and meeting views are actually pretty well done compared to the competition.

    • batcheck@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      1 month ago

      I can’t even get my InfoSec team to let us use all the features we already pay for in our M365 E5 license because they can’t figure out how to secure and govern it. Unfortunately nowadays bringing up great ideas that are open source to replace mediocre big tech products mostly gets laughed out of the room 😢

    • akilou@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      0·
      1 month ago

      This is awesome. But I’m a little suspicious. How is it completely free? Seems like video conferencing would use a lot of resources

      • catloaf@lemm.eeEnglish
        2·
        1 month ago

        Only if you route the video through the server. The modern design is to establish a connection through the server, then send the video directly from peer to peer. You can look up STUN, TURN, and ICE if you want technical details.