1000004515

Not sure how long this has been a thing but I was surprised to see that you cannot view the content without either agreeing to all or paying to reject.

  • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Wouldn’t this be blatantly in conflict with the EU cookie law? Like I’m not from Europe but my understanding was that it needs to be equally easy to accept or reject all cookies. Dark patterns aren’t allowed

      • kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        i think this one might, actually. When the EU passes a law like this, each member state passes it into their own national law, and so if these cookies laws were implemented before the UK left the EU they’d likely still be there

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s more than that. The EU law lets any EU citizen report a company that’s not in compliance. That includes companies not strictly in the EU. It’s why even US companies tend to be in compliance (or something like compliance).

          • suction@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            If their product is accessible from within the EU, they have to implement the proper rules. That’s why many of the minor / weird news sites aren’t accessible from the EU anymore without VPN. Which I consider a win for EU citizens.

      • Don_alForno@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        Deutsch
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        It’s not a grey area, it’s clearly illegal (consent has to be given voluntarily. If you can’t use the site without paying, that’s not voluntary). Agencies so far just decided to look the other way and play dumb. There are lawsuits ongoing.