• Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Because if enough people do that, it actually can result in that state not “doing what it always does.”

    Assuming voting for X is going to result in Y getting elected over Z “anyways” is not a good strategy for getting what you want.

    • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      What I want is more than 2 fucking options. What you are assuming is that I wouldn’t get what I want if a conservative won NY. For this to happen there would need to be a mass exodus of democrats abandoning their party to vote conservative. So for that to happen either the democratic candidate is God awful or the conservative is a homerun. Either way I dont give a fuck.

      I vote for my interests in state and local elections. Presidential elections in NY are the least concerning elections as they should be for every fuckin American.

      • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        If you want more than two options vote for Democrats in primaries that support ranked choice voting initiatives. As it stands, you realistically have a binary choice and until you have ranked choice voting that will continue to be true.