• StaySquared@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    WTF… When did employers start reporting our income into a national/international database for other employers to view? Is it even mentioned in our contracts with the employer?

    • kevincox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Since doing so allowed them to see other data. Then they can use it for making offers that are as low as possible.

      Basically it raises their bargaining power. They know how much you make now and will use that to scale their offer.

      Capitalists will minimize costs. It is their job.

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    And of course freezing this data is possible, but you have to mail it in, along with proof of identity. 🙄

  • Anonymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Consider what would happen if employees across the globe posted to an open database about their employer, position title, salary bonus and health care information. I’m sure we’d all be sued. How is this legal?

    • OminousOrange@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Why would we be sued? It’s definitely not illegal here in Canada to discuss your employment details.

        • OminousOrange@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          On what grounds? Surely no one with a regular job would sign a contract prohibiting them from discussing the details of their employment.

          • Technoguyfication@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            You don’t need a contract. In the United States, anyone can sue anyone for anything. No laws need to have been broken nor contracts breached.

      • Anonymouse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t know the legal side, but employers don’t want you to talk about your compensation with anyone. Maybe it’s legal, but definitely frowned upon.

    • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The biggest annoyance to me personally, with fediverse communities. Complete fragmentation.

      Not to say I want a centralised control, but something in the middle

      • Dave.@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I have to wonder if there is a way for clients to glom together duplicate posts across your subscribed communities into one, and if you reply to a thread in that post it passes it back to the correct discussion.

        I mean, you’d still see repetitive stuff in the post’s comments from your point of view, but everything would be in one place from your perspective and it would be semi-transparent, at least for the communities you subscribe to.

        All the information is there, it should be doable…

      • Starbuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It does make establishing a critical mass of comments to make a good discussion difficult. I’ve had it once or twice where I discovered a post in one community commented and didn’t get any replies, only to discover some other discussion on the same content happened elsewhere on the fediverse that I wasn’t subscribed to.

        • slacktoid@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I heard someone describe it as discussing a topic in different bars. You’ll get a slightly different niche in each space. Has its pros and cons. But beats the centralization.