No that’s exactly what’s happened.

I said Facebook because we know they’re doing it and you’d still have to actually prove that case.

The argument here is more along the lines of, “you can’t make a law that defines something as murder only when I do it.”

Legally it is a very good argument. A law targeting a single company in name or effect is literally unconstitutional. It’s called a “Bill of Attainder”.

The counter argument is indicting Facebook because they never stopped selling information directly to the CCP.

He did. But the proponents of Greater Israel do actually include Lebanon. They also include Jordan, Syria, parts of Egypt, Parts of Saudi Arabia, and parts of Iraq.

This ideology is dominant in the ruling party of Israel.

So that kid was Hezbollah too then?

Hold on let me go check history, yup, yup, history says that it’s very possible. Which makes one wonder, why is Israel doing this?

There is a large difference between war and genocide. The last group to say you couldn’t have a war without genocide was the Serbians.

I continue to live in hope you will realize victim blaming the people you blow up isn’t an argument.

Nah.

It’s a summation, science isn’t into clickbait.

No. You’ve had two shots at this question and both answers will do here.

Isn’t also a game at defcon to spread a harmless package to as many devices as possible?

If the paper says something the abstract doesn’t then it’s a bad paper or a bad abstract.

I absolutely provided a link, it’s even labeled, “IPC Report Link”.

And no. The news article is very clear these checkpoints are inside Gaza, not at the border. Which again is there for you and everyone else to read.

And lmao you think Hamas is what? Paying the UN to say they’ve been attacked by Israel? You know what don’t answer that. I’m not sure why I even replied to this post since it’s very obvious your only angle here is to deny all evidence of Israel’s crimes. No matter how damning.

No you asked why hadn’t they raised prices before. And I was nice enough to let the flawed premise pass, (they have raised them before, they’d be out of business if they hadn’t) and give you the layman’s answer to your layman’s question.

Now you want to say it meant something else, something the English you wrote doesn’t support.

No.

Oh you see, you could have asked that way up there. And I’d tell you that you’re operating from a flawed premise. Economics actually talks quite a lot about monopoly power and rent seeking.

So funny story. I’ve gone to every link you’ve provided to me and none of them were a UN study.

Also a funny story, one link I provided you had multiple IPC reports. So that tells me you aren’t reading my links, and that your claim of “one FRC report” is laughable.

In the same lane, you also obviously didn’t click though to the news article I provided in the last comment. Or you wouldn’t have said something so demonstrably false about Gazan aid being turned around. Also, again, if you’re going to comment in so many places, re-read the thread real quick to make sure you haven’t forgotten something important. Like the fact that I mentioned that in the last 3 comments. It’s not in fact something new.

Finally, accusing UNRWA of incompetence while blocking and attacking their aid convoys has been an Israeli propaganda line for most of the past ~10 months. The fact you’ve gone in on that twice now is enough for me to just leave this here. You’re not here in good faith.

That is not the Socratic method. Questioning how the CEO of a corporation has control over pricing is just trolling.

His source is the Israeli government.

Oh really? The UN’s own research? I’m sure you’ll be willing to share?

Something more than an abstract accusing UNRWA of being unable to count because of Israeli actions?

And finally, no. You keep dodging around it but we’re talking about checkpoints inside Gaza preventing aid from being distributed.

God this is tiring. This shit is headline news for months, nearly a year now. With report after report telling the same story. And yet Zionists are always around to tell us how this one crumb of information disproves it all if you just look at it sideways and don’t actually read what it says.