This is not in any way a “threat to public safety” but it’s still a cringe decision.
The inability to block users actually makes moderation even more necessary and makes it harder to allow “free speech.”
This is not in any way a “threat to public safety” but it’s still a cringe decision.
The inability to block users actually makes moderation even more necessary and makes it harder to allow “free speech.”
The only things that I can fill it up with are video games and video recordings. Hoarding downloaded files can also build up over time.
I have mixed feelings. “Because I said so” can get compliance in high school, but that’s mostly it. It’s not going to be that effective. At the same time, a lot of this overly permissive parenting seems like a reaction by people who are upset about being told no as kids and that will lead to problems, especially once they get into places that don’t care about constantly trying to have a debate back and fourth.
Imagine if Google’s decision to do this to fight adblockers results in them losing the lead in the browser war because everyone switches to other browsers.
I was wondering about this. If they didn’t keep track of who is voting, manipulation would be easier then it already is. The problem is that rogue instance admins could make votes public.
I agree with the sentiment, but it doesn’t hold up in reality.
Having any sort of engagement with rightoids results in your feed getting filled with Nazi shit.